IF...If ABC were willing to compromise with the rest of the community, this is what it would look like.

It's simple. Just keep the current DAA for 6 more months while the technicals are debated. Most of us don't think a controversey over the DAA is worth a split, and there's no harm waiting, so let's just all agree not to make any DAA change because this it's certainly reasonable to say we need more time to discuss this.

But, with ABC's statement that "they are going forward" , there is really no reason to assume they are interested in a compromise, as their actions aren't reflecting that, nor are their words.

Given all that, would it be unreasonable to conclude then, that ABC actively wants a chain split and is creating that situation now by refusing to delay Grasburg?

submitted by /u/jonald_fyookball
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/i3b8m1/ifif_abc_were_willing_to_compromise_with_the_rest/