The other day Roger theorized that Jack Dorsey (Twitter CEO) and Elizabeth Starkness (Lightning CEO) could have had / be having a relationship, and that was clouding Jack's judgement.
My read on this is "possible conflict of interest" but the SJW have jumped on this as an example of "misogyny".
I can't find any trace of misogyny here. I invite everyone to partake in a thought experiment. Let's turn the logic around and see if it works the other way: if Roger had suggested that the putative affair had clouded Starkness's judgement, would that make him a misandrist? Clearly not.
The claim of misogyny is rated: PANTS ON FIRE BULLSHIT
[link] [comments]
source https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/cp8rir/if_roger_had_hypothesized_that_jack_starkness/