This will be the 6th time

submitted by /u/BuyBitcoinWhileItsLo [link] [comments]

Bitcoin Cash pumps despite controversial new miner tax

submitted by /u/SaneFive [link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/eumklq/bitcoin_cash_pumps_despite_controversial_new/

Growth In The Level Of Precision Of Bitcoin Spending

submitted by /u/BitMEXResearch [link] [comments]

Told my Mother to read 'The Creature From Jekyll Island' by Edward Griffin. Not only did she read it in one day, she sent me this quote, sells all her bank shares and has just bought her first Bitcoin. Tell everyone you know to read this book and read it yourself if you haven't!

submitted by /u/junglehypothesis [link] [comments]

If Bitcoin Cash forks - who are the developers that will work on the "non-funded" chain? Introduce yourselves if you like.

Who are the developers that will be developing on the fork of Bitcoin Cash if a split happens?

Bitcoin Cash is the best cryptocurrency IMHO. Whether I like this funding issue or not, I am not a miner so I don't have a say. As a user I don't see how this is going to affect me.

If someone worries that if miners can do A then they will do B, well I will wait until B happens before having a melt-down. Otherwise it is known as being on a slippery slope.

What I see happening is that developing Bitcoin Cash into a global peer to peer currency is getting funded and I like that!

submitted by /u/whyison
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/euig88/if_bitcoin_cash_forks_who_are_the_developers_that/

How can the BCH developer fund not happen?

How can the BCH developer fund not happen? The one that claims 12.5% of all mined blocks.

Jiang Zhuoer, Jihan Wu, Haipo Yang, Roger Ver and Amaury Sechet are all in favour of it.

I just can't see how this will not happen if all those people are in favour.

submitted by /u/amlodhix
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/eul8g9/how_can_the_bch_developer_fund_not_happen/

"Oh, look, another troll!"

I really enjoy the open discussion about the new dev funding proposal (which I personally find, at least in this form, not to be so good of an idea), but it always bugs me how some of you guys preffer to just call anyone you disagree with a troll and immiedietly assume he/she is part of a new "attack of BCH", instead of at least trying to engage in a civilized discussion first.

Sure, some people you disagree with may post from new accounts and have shitty karma, but they often still have some valid arguments. Calling them "trolls" does not refute them, it just makes it look like they cannot be reasonably countered, that's why you fallback to name-calling, generalizing and trying to divide the community into the "good guys" (those that agree with you) and the trolls/attackers.

It's funny because sometimes the same people who practice this "troll-labeling" and reject the opportunity to have any open discussion at all, also act as if they value and defend it. That's not how you do it. Trying to silence valid arguments by de-humanizing people who present them and acting as if discussion with them "does not make any sense anyway" (before even trying!) is almost as bad as censorship itself. It's just one little step before you say: "Let's just ban all those people who push this agenda, since they obviously are just trolling and bring nothing of value to this sub". Maybe you'd even do it if you had the power to...

I think such behavior does not get enough opposition here and too often people try to justify it, sometimes using examples of some actual trolling that happend in the past. Let's stop confusing valid opposition with trolling.

submitted by /u/Lezek123
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/eulfnt/oh_look_another_troll/