All those idle money can be invested, or stored, in bitcoin where it does not depend/follow any underlying business/economy. What do you guys think?
[link] [comments]
This blog brings you the best Cryptocurrency & Blockchain, ICO & P2P and Exchange & Laws news. Also contains technology and research based post from all around the world every single day. Get informed! Think Future!
All those idle money can be invested, or stored, in bitcoin where it does not depend/follow any underlying business/economy. What do you guys think?
Please utilize this sticky thread for all general Bitcoin discussions! If you see posts on the front page or /r/Bitcoin/new which are better suited for this daily discussion thread, please help out by directing the OP to this thread instead. Thank you!
If you don't get an answer to your question, you can try phrasing it differently or commenting again tomorrow.
Join us in the r/Bitcoin Chatroom!
Please check the previous discussion thread for unanswered questions.
Saw an elderly man (maybe 65-75) today at the grocery store in a Bitcoin shirt. Didn’t say anything the first time I saw him but told my wife and was like “adoption, that man gets it”.
Later seeing him at the checkout, I told him I love the shirt and he replied “keep stacking”. That’s why I’m a believer in Bitcoin bc if the older generation is starting to get on board and adapting then we have even more growth in our future, so from the guy at the store, Keep stacking.
Andreas Antonopoulos brought this up in a recent podcast. Bitcoin's narrative has shifted a lot from banking the un-banked, and replacing old corrupt institutions.
Now, the community is simping for these same corrupt institutions, as soon as they started pumping the price. I can guarantee, these institutions do not care about Bitcoin's censorship resistance, decentralization, or about banking the un-banked. They've just bought Bitcoin, then created hype so that their own investments can go up.
These institutions will not support changes that improve privacy, as that makes it harder for regulators. They will try to "normalize" Bitcoin into traditional systems. For example, Michael Saylor has said that Bitcoin isn't meant to be used as a currency, he said its just a store of value and a gold replacement.
He's trying to make it fit into traditional systems. So called "normalization of Bitcoin" is bad. People are trying to make it fit into the same institutions it was meant to replace.
This institutional investment into Bitcoin is only good, if the only you care about is the price of Bitcoin.
This community overall has also degraded to where all anyone talks about is these institutions, and the price.
This hype cycle will eventually die out, and the people who care about price will leave. The people who care about price will sell, and then the big institutions will also panic and sell, and 2017 will be repeated.
To anyone who is newly into to Bitcoin and bought hoping the price will go up, I don't want to attack you. Instead, I highly encourage you to learn more about what Bitcoin, and cryptocurrency in general is. Learn about how it works, and what problems it actually solves.
I am tired of people defending Bill Gates and saying things like, "Microsoft uses open source development and accepts crypto" or "He is looking out for small investors by warning them against volatility". Microsoft is adopting these things because their attacks against them failed. Where was Bill when small investors were getting wrecked in the stock market or losing their pensions? Where was his love for open source when Microsoft attacked open source licenses? Let's take a look at the history of Bill Gates and Microsoft regarding open source and crypto:
If I missed anything let me know and I'll add it to the list maybe.
TL;DR Bill Gates does not have your best interests in mind.
EDIT: For everyone pointing to Bill Gates and his philanthropy, I could do another full post about how corrupt his foundations are. He is taking resource rights away from local businesses in third-world countries and disenfranchising family owned farms. This is all paving the way for large corps to control and sell the resources of a country instead of the local population (all under the guise of feeding the world). If it was appropriate for me to post a timeline of this as well, I would. But this ain't the sub for it.