submitted by /u/maff1989 [link] [comments] |
source https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9xr2w5/i_just_want_to_be_left_alone_so_your_plan_this/
This blog brings you the best Cryptocurrency & Blockchain, ICO & P2P and Exchange & Laws news. Also contains technology and research based post from all around the world every single day. Get informed! Think Future!
"Chain Y is 30 blocks ahead of chain Z, therefore chain Y wins"
This is irrelevant as the chains have split and are mining on different rules/difficulty. "block ahead" only matters for miners who are on the same chain.
"It does not matter if chain Z has more hash rate than chain Y, they have forked and are not compatible"
It is true that no amount of hashrate of chain Z can make a difference for chain Y, they are mining on different chains with different rules. But it does matter if chain Z moves some of their hashrate to chain Y to disrupt it (empty blocks and reverting transactions)
"A checkpoint will save us from a 51% attack"
Checkpoints only prevent disruption of the past, it doesn't do anything to prevent disruption after the checkpoint.
"Hash rate decides who wins"
It may look like this is true now, because BCH(ABC) has more hash rate and is winning, but imagine if SV had more hashrate, would the entire BCH community just rollover and admit defeat? No, hash rate only helps to prevent disruption. The people behind BCH(ABC) don't just go away because someone has more money to throw away on mining.
Reason #1: Different incompatible rules result in a chain split. Period! Even if you mine empty blocks, the coinbase rewards will diverge the UTXO.
Reason #2: There's been a bizarre misinterpretation of "Nakamoto Consensus" which clearly can only apply to differing chains on the same rules. The only possible way to have a "hash war" on differently ruled chains is for one chain to attack the other, which the whitepaper says is "dishonest mining" and by common sense is disrupting people who want to run a network in peace.
Reason #3: A chain that is fractured, at war with itself, would be doing tremendous damage to its own brand the longer it goes on. We're already seeing the damage just having exchanges be down for 2 days. Imagine that went on for weeks and months like Coingeek and nChain wanted? My god. There will be nothing left to fight over.
Thankfully we're spltting off. The hash war is over. BSV can continue to show off its hash rate in hopes of influencing some exchange (good luck)...They can even try to 51% attack. (I doubt they will succeed). But regardless of what they do, they will never be Bitcoin... for Bitcoin is permissionless p2p cash, and for that idea to happen, it requires a community that is dedicated to the ideals aligned with that vision.
Twitter is such a terrible, cancerous, propaganda&brainwashing-filled service I am starting to think it may be even worse than TV.
Twitter is the perfect tool to create mass hysteria out of complete void.