I'm worried about splitting is a good thing. Certainly, the worst thing you can split is the strength of bitcoin, but if the BCH community who has experienced splitting twice in the past becomes split again in this short time, many people will give up and be amazed, Wouldn't be able to follow . We are willing to cooperate in avoiding the fork, but honestly, we don't care about the controversy about what's right or what's wrong. The debate about whether it's a TAX or a TAX is really silly. The important thing is that many people deny this fact, and that if BCH enforces this, "many people will lose interest in BCH". Conversely, some people lose interest in BCH even if they ignore the problem of funding altogether. If not inclusive, BCH will not win. Obviously, if the BCH branches again, the BSV will exceed the BCH by market capitalization, and knowing that they have enough incentive to trigger the BCH branch. It is ironic that the code that enables such actions is prepared on the BCH side.
[link] [comments]
source https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/f7omwr/bch_tax/
Comments
Post a Comment