The narrative that we need to "stop funding infrastructure and focus on adoption" is stupid.

Bitcoin Cash is a diverse ecosystem where community contributors can focus on many different sub-communities:

• The people creating memes, sockpuppets, graphs and charts are one area of the community. Reddit and Twitter shitposters, basically.

• The people developing infrastructure are another area. ABC, BCH Node, BU, BCHD, etc

• The miners are their own area.

• Devs creating useful trustless apps are another area. Open Bazaar, Crescent, CashFusion, Full stack.cash, Memo, etc

• Services and businesses are another area. Bitcoin.com, Purse.io, AnyHedge, Cryptophyl, Bitpay, Read.cash, be.cash, etc

• Real world groups and meetups are "on the streets" bringing the technology to the people through real life gatherings. Townsville AUS, BCH House Venezuela, etc

We can (and we ARE) pursuing adoption strategies and pushing infrastructure features/enhancements.

These sub-communities all exist simultaneously without subtracting from the others. In fact, they enhance each other because of the cross-pollination of ideas and funding.

submitted by /u/World_Money
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/gl8nw6/the_narrative_that_we_need_to_stop_funding/