This is an example of how entrenched these reddit-debates in bitcoin can become.
Below is a link to a debate where my fellow bigblocker /u/excalibur0922 and I go back and forth 40 times to get clarity on the question in the title of this post:
Does a transfer of a GROUP token require permission from the issuer?
I figured out quickly that we needed to find a common set of reality and terminology in the GROUP/Tokeda discussion. So I tried to get us to agree on two basic things:
- That transfers of Tokeda tokens need permission from the issuer of the token.
- That transfers of GROUP tokens does not need permission from the issuer of the token.
The first point what easy, the next not so much....
He starts out early by saying that both Tokeda and GROUP transfers need permission from the issuer and give reasons for that.
This is such a basic premise we have to get right to be able to have a meaningful, logic discussion. So I start to push him on this issue and demand that he give a clear statement on this.
But will he do it?
If you are patient enough to browse through the most boring ping pong match in the world, you will find out. Here is the link:
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/8xov48/group_tokenization_proposal/e2d6c47/
[link] [comments]
source https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/8ysi3e/does_a_transfer_of_a_group_token_require/
Comments
Post a Comment