"The fact that [BCH] even exists is quite literally a violation of Nakamoto consensus." ~BashCo

In order to further my understanding of Bitcoin and the history of BCH and BTC, please explain to me how you would argue against this recent statement made by /u/bashco.

EDIT: Please keep your comments civil in here. If we can't have open, honest, AND respectful debates here in /r/btc then where can we? Can you make your point without resorting to personal attacks and tribal rhetoric?

submitted by /u/Tomayachi
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/d0s5ot/the_fact_that_bch_even_exists_is_quite_literally/