Exactly how much funding and how much resources are we using to analyze the Grasberg historical radical drift experiment. That includes now and into the future.

I thought we had barely enough funds to 'keep the lights on' and keep Bitcoin cash going. But now we are SUDDENLY pouring resources into an inconsequential controversial radical idealistic code that 'corrects historical drift' something Satoshi himself never even bothered to blink an eye about or even consider (maybe because the idea lacks merit)

This is such a huge contradiction. Hours and hours, simulations simulations, meetings, resources, all spent on this Grasberg endevour.... Yet we need funds to simply 'keep the lights on and keep bch going blah blahblah'.

We fund abc, they give us .... something random, something we didn't ask for, something not on the roadmap, every one is SURPRISED....

OH OK SO you need my funds to fund.... GRASBERG and any technical debt it may constitute, and keep the lights on. Don't bother planning, just code radical ideas into the protocol days before the freeze date, awesome development strategy.

submitted by /u/Terrible-Chipmunk
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/i1mrka/exactly_how_much_funding_and_how_much_resources/