Do you assume you know intent of a comment here? Don't assist BCH haters stir the pot as some ARE doing here!

Lets stay focused on reason, facts & evidence!

Example, this comment

Knight is right - BCH should avoid CSW like the plague. Any coin that uses nChain patents in the protocol hands over control of the coin and makes CSW / nChain the gatekeeper to development. BCH is, and always should be, built on FOSS.

A brief check of NippleGlitter's history shows they are CLEARLY a BCH hater as recent comments as below prove:

• Bitpay is a shitstain of a company. They are a bunch of scammers and liars with a political agenda funded by Roger Ver...

• My point is Bcash isnt used, whereas Doge is.

• and many more...

Now of course just because NippleGlitter is a BCH hater doesnt automatically make everything he posts here in r/btc wrong. But one should wonder, when one truly hates BCH as NippleGlitter's comments show, then why would he bother to post here about avoiding CSW and only FOSS should be used. He conveniently forgets/doesnt know that BlockStream has patents as well... buts thats another discussion...

Is this person really looking out for BCH's best interest by stating BCH'ers should avoid CSW and only use FOSS?

While one may believe they should avoid-or not-CSW/nChain/patents etc..., lets try and keep it based on facts, actions etc... not on input from BCH haters trying to stir the pot... I am sure NippleGlitter is not the only BCH hater trying to stir the pot here...

---

Lets keep any pot stirring among Peer-2-Peer Electronic Cash Supporters/Doers!

submitted by /u/unstoppable-cash
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/90ncpc/do_you_assume_you_know_intent_of_a_comment_here/