This was just one flawed argument that small blockers used against big blockers, to give the perception that the security of the network was at risk because "not enough full nodes", even though [Blockstream] was responsible for the artificial "decline" after version 0.10.3
![This was just one flawed argument that small blockers used against big blockers, to give the perception that the security of the network was at risk because "not enough full nodes", even though [Blockstream] was responsible for the artificial "decline" after version 0.10.3](https://b.thumbs.redditmedia.com/BXWXdy5f3dqibdgPY0HDmrJEba20OGdrmfYKR5EfTuw.jpg "This was just one flawed argument that small blockers used against big blockers, to give the perception that the security of the network was at risk because \"not enough full nodes\", even though [Blockstream] was responsible for the artificial \"decline\" after version 0.10.3")
Comments
Post a Comment