![This was just one flawed argument that small blockers used against big blockers, to give the perception that the security of the network was at risk because "not enough full nodes", even though [Blockstream] was responsible for the artificial "decline" after version 0.10.3](https://b.thumbs.redditmedia.com/BXWXdy5f3dqibdgPY0HDmrJEba20OGdrmfYKR5EfTuw.jpg "This was just one flawed argument that small blockers used against big blockers, to give the perception that the security of the network was at risk because \"not enough full nodes\", even though [Blockstream] was responsible for the artificial \"decline\" after version 0.10.3") |
submitted by /u/kybarnet [link] [comments] |
source https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/90k2od/this_was_just_one_flawed_argument_that_small/
Saturday, 21 July 2018
This was just one flawed argument that small blockers used against big blockers, to give the perception that the security of the network was at risk because "not enough full nodes", even though [Blockstream] was responsible for the artificial "decline" after version 0.10.3
source https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/90k2od/this_was_just_one_flawed_argument_that_small/
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Crypto is pretty much the only reason I used Reddit anymore, and I'd like to stop using this website. submitted by /u/TheTruthHas...
-
submitted by /u/FearlessEggplant3036 [link] [comments] source https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/12gt49l/supposedly_insiders_in_t...
-
submitted by /u/KillerHurdz [link] [comments] source https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/a6bm9y/discussing_bitcoin_power_dyn...
No comments:
Post a Comment