What is the issue with removing the block size limit and having miners enforce a soft limit themselves? If we do this for the next upgrade, then BSV will have no reason to exist (not that it has much of a reason now). Not doing this is a big mistake imo, as there is clearly an audience who wants this, and are taking a large market share away from BCH.
I also think that it's not a terrible idea to lock down the protocol and abandon the hard forks every 6 months. If an upgrade is truly needed, then it should be proposed for a hard fork far in the future (years), so that we ensure all nodes have upgraded.
[link] [comments]
source https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/gphv6v/couldnt_we_end_this_bch_vs_bsv_thing_with_one/
No comments:
Post a Comment