Saturday, 7 July 2018

Doesn't a 'fork' of Bitcoin imply that whichever of the forked blockchains is truly 'Bitcoin' is debatable?

At first I was brainwashed by the Bitcoin reddit into thinking that Bitcoin, Segwit and LN are the way.

After doing research and learning of the censorship (and its intent) I am convinced that BCH represents the true intent of Bitcoin.

One criticism of those like Roger Ver is that he calls BCH the real Bitcoin - I don't think he is wrong. And who is to say he is?

The community should decide. A fork means that two cryptos emerged from one. Who is any one person to say that one is truly Bitcoin vs. the other?

submitted by /u/jdh7190
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/8wqqwc/doesnt_a_fork_of_bitcoin_imply_that_whichever_of/

No comments:

Post a Comment