Thursday, 30 August 2018

CoinGeek is publishing blatant false information in an article

In this article

https://coingeek.com/coingeek-sponsored-bitcoin-miners-meeting-bangkok-unanimously-supports-satoshi-vision-miners-choice/

coingeek claims that the meeting happened and miners were unanimous

The CoinGeek-sponsored miners meetings at the W Hotel in Bangkok, Thailand have wrapped up and the Bitcoin BCH miners in attendance are unanimously supporting Satoshi Vision and Miners’ Choice

but Jihan already denied it

https://twitter.com/JihanWu/status/1035006420943429633

Also, the article says that

Bitmain CEO Jihan Wu has been pushing for another hard fork. His possible motivation is that pre-consensus and CTO will benefit Project Wormhole, a layer-2 technology that allows for the creation of smart contracts.

This was already publicly denied by the main dev of OMNI, u/dexx7, the protocol on top of which wormhole is built

Clarification: Omni and Wormhole do not benefit from canonical transaction ordering

So WTH is this shitty journalism about? Do we need to lie to make a point?

submitted by /u/rdar1999
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9bhn98/coingeek_is_publishing_blatant_false_information/

No comments:

Post a Comment