We all want onchain scaling. We all agree with the whitepaper. We all know why BCH is here in the first place. BCH has no similar ideological rift that resulted in the BTC BCH fork.
What does exist is a rift over one man, those who support him and those who don't. One man has controversy follow him, so be it. That controversy is his. There are efforts to turn the controversy about him into a controversy about BCH. That there is a rift in him means there is a rift in BCH. This is far from the truth. There is an effort the turn the narrative to anti CSW meaning pro ABC. This is far from the truth. You can be anti ABC + anti CSW, whatever combination you like. Just because you don't want a SV client, doesn't mean you want CTOR + DSV. Just because CTOR + DSV might render someone's patents useless, isn't reason alone to add them(Segwit vs ASIC boost anyone?)
To me, it looks like controversy around CSW is being leveraged to push changes most don't want. Sounds familiar.
When you cut through all the crap, I think the community agrees on a lot more things than it disagrees on.
[link] [comments]
source https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9arnx0/there_is_no_real_split_in_the_bch_community/
No comments:
Post a Comment