Amaury Sechet has not told us what he means exactly by "pre-consensus", all he has said is that he plans to "take actions that irritate many". This is very concerning. He should not be so vague if he did not want to cause drama.

As you can see he has said he plans to take actions that irritate many. Some like /u/lovelyday have tried to say he means weak blocks/sub chains. But this cannot be the case since weak blocks are neither a soft or hard fork and are completely optional from my understanding. He must have something deeper in mind if it would result in actions that "irritate many". It sounds more like some type of controversial hard fork, which is the one influence Amaury has in the system to push for his ABC client. Some have said he has voiced concerns that weakblocks are not good enough for 0-conf.

So if Amaury is planning something more radical why is he not telling us specifics, and making threats about irritating people? This does not seem like the smart way to do things. We as a community should demand that he explain what "pre-consensus" changes he actually plans to take and why they will irritate people. If not, we should consider replacing him with somebody more competent.

submitted by /u/cryptorebel
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/93114s/amaury_sechet_has_not_told_us_what_he_means/