Funny how money changes things. Core Devs actually wanted big blocks:
Adam Back (2015) (before he was Blockstream CEO): "My suggestion 2MB now, then 4MB in 2 years and 8MB in 4years then re-asses."
Pieter Wuille (2013) (before he was Blockstream co-founder): "I'm in favor of increasing the block size limit in a hard fork, but very much against removing the limit entirely... My suggestion would be a one-time increase to perhaps 10 MiB or 100 MiB blocks (to be debated), and after that an at-most slow exponential further growth."
Theymos (2010) (before turning /r/Bitcoin into a censored cesspool): "In the future most people will run Bitcoin in a "simple" mode that doesn't require downloading full blocks or transactions. At that point MAX_BLOCK_SIZE can be increased a lot."
Creadits to /u/freefactoid, here.
UPDATE: Seems he already posted it himself.
[link] [comments]
source https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9728fd/everyone_supported_a_block_size_increase_even_the/
No comments:
Post a Comment