So for the most part, I believe that bch has the following pros and cons: I think it's always good to be honest and admit when there is something that could be improved or if you have some issues.
pros:
0 conf transactions are somewhat safe and fast
transaction fees are among the cheapest across the top coins not including 0 fee coins.
the low but non-zero fee deters spam transactions better than 0 fee transactions as seen with nano, before they upgrade.
community is very good/generous (/r/btc is the main reason cryptoforthehomeless.org was able to begin giving out meals)
cons:
larger barrier to entry for nodes as time goes on, but as hard drive space/bandwidth gets cheaper this may be a non-issue.
number of unsavory figures tied to the coin - there are a handful of people I wouldn't want to be the face of the coin representing it on social media and it is NOT GOOD. Doesn't take away from the usefulness of the coin, but I have no doubt in my mind that they have HUGE personal gain from doing what they are doing and care about themselves far more than the community.
possibly proof of work scaling worse than proof of stake - although I understand the problems with using PoS.
non-asic proof mining - centralized mining in china for bch.
so far these are the main things I could come up with, I was just curious about what BCH supporters list as their "cons" for the coin.
[link] [comments]
source https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/n9nyba/people_who_have_fully_switched_over_to_bch_what/
Comments
Post a Comment